Defining Shooters: Sacrifice and Halo: Reach


Why Halo: Reach was one of the defining shooters of the last few years. 

You’re playing a game and you’re a hero. Your character has a host of powers and abilities; at some point you’ll likely lose these for narrative or other purposes but you’ll get them back before the end (only for them to largely rendered useless in any boss fights that might be along the way).

Still, you’re there to save the day and as dire as the circumstances might be, your character typically feels powerful even if they’re not quite in control of the situation.

That’s not the case in Halo: Reach. Sure, you’re a seven foot tall super soldier but from the very beginning of Bungie‘s last entry in the Halo series it’s clear the odds are stacked against you. Noble 6 is not the world-saver Master Chief is, this Spartan‘s futile duty is to fend off the Covenant invasion and make the final, ultimate sacrifice.

Even within the Halo series the feeling of humanity’s hopeless struggle against an impeccable alien foe is rarely as apparent.

There aren’t many games that ask this of players and there certainly aren’t many shooters that make the sense of gravitas and hopeless desperation so abundantly clear as Bungie did in Halo: Reach. Even within the Halo series the feeling of humanity’s hopeless struggle against an impeccable alien foe is rarely as apparent.

This sensation is clear from early within the second mission of the game – Winter Contingency. Technically, Noble Actual, the game’s opening cinematic, is a mission. Your communications are cut off from UNSC command and immediately there is a sense of isolation. Soon you encounter a farmer who relays the situation – there are Covenant forces on the planet.

“Not here, not Reach,” Jorge whispers.

Humanity’s second home, the headquarters of the UNSC military, is under attack. This is something else, and the sense of desperation is palpable in a way it never is in other games throughout the series – even during the attacks on Earth in Halo 2 and Halo 3.

You fought long and hard and gave Reach your will live on in the annals of history, and all of humanity will sing your praises for centuries to come. Be the lone wolf if you desire and fight for all you can, but know that this is not a battle you can win. It is time to say goodbye. – Halo Reach: Legendary Edition Guide.

One by one Noble Six’s team dies and ultimately that Spartan chooses to stay behind knowing full well the futility of doing so. That fateful decision, all so 117 and the Pillar of Autumn can escape Reach.

Of course, nothing is ever that simple. Finding the Halo ring is not enough, the war drags on. Even in the truce that follows the activation of the Arc, conflict breaks out once again as Master Chief is drawn into the Reclaimer Saga. In that regard, Noble 6’s sacrifice was an action made in vain.

The Spartan’s death ultimately saved the human race from The Flood by allowing the Pillar of Autumn and its cargo to flee the falling planet. Across the scope of the entire Halo series Noble Six’s choice to stay behind – remember, the soldier was never ordered to do so – could be seen as a futile gesture. Yet in the context of Reach itself, it was a necessary step with the fate not only of the UNSC, but the entire human race at stake.

There is a degree of hope at the very end as the Pillar of Autumn leaves, avoiding the Covenant fleet and entering slipspace, and this is reinforced by Bungie’s fantastic tribute to the series they created following the credits.

And then Noble Six is left alone, the last warrior on a dying world and sooner or later you’re overrun by the hordes of Covenant fanatics.

[Bungie’s] next project, Destiny, looks to be an entirely different prospect but that’s alright, there’s room for all kinds of games with all kinds of stories.

Halo: Reach is a game with a sense of desperation in which the overriding futility of war is evident in a manner few games ever dare to explore let alone centre on as a core theme and for that Bungie should be commended. Their next project, Destiny, looks to be an entirely different prospect but that’s alright, there’s room for all kinds of games with all kinds of stories.

343 Industries opted for a slightly darker tinge in Halo 4 and despite the game’s conclusion, Master Chief ultimately saved the day once more. Perhaps one day there’ll be another Noble Six but many players will always want to save the day, and that’s fine too.

This article is the second part of the Defining Shooters series, you can read the first, on conflict and Spec Ops: The Line, here

Purchase your copy of Halo: Reach from Amazon now!

About these ads

About Stephen Daly

Co-editor of game culture and lifestyle site gamemoir.com and a news editor for Gameranx. You can follow me on Twitter at @StephenDaly_ or email sdaly@gamemoir.com.

There are 5 comments

  1. ceekyuucee

    (I GET TO GUSH ABOUT REACH SO EXCITED)

    Reach is probably my favorite video game of all time, for this very reason (that and I can finally be a female Spartan). I’m always a sucker for heroic sacrifice in stories and going out fighting an entire army to save humanity is one of the best ways to do it. I always get really runny eyed at the end. “Negative. I have the gun.”

    Sacrifice when done well adds substantial weight to a story and it felt like Reach really did a good job at this. Even how Kat died, which I thought was kind of bullshit, adds to the desperation felt during the game. Maybe how I felt was tinged by reading several of the books prior and knowing how hopeless it was, but the opening of the game, with your helmet burned and broken, buried in the ground, set the tone really well.

    Halo 4 was only really darker than Reach because of who died in it. That point was really sad, but I think it had more character development and time to get attached to generate an emotional response. I got emotional for each member of Noble who died. I got attached to them. My gameplay as the game went on kind of changed to match, too. I’m typically a long to mid range shooter, but as I got more upset and frustrated at the death of my friends and allies, I got more close range. On Legendary. Which is dumb. But I pulled it off, and I’ve never had a gaming experience quite as satisfying as that first playthrough of Reach because everything hit hard, and I hit back ten times harder.

    Like

      1. ceekyuucee

        Me, too. I think that, in a way, the hopelessness made me play all the harder. With other games, you know things will turn out in one way or another and it takes away some of the weight. When you get to the last “level” with the single directive, “survive,” I tried my hardest to survive as long as I could. I was on Legendary, though, so I didn’t do a fantastic job of it (only killed maybe 20-30 enemies?), but I didn’t feel like I did a bad job. I need to go replay that again. It’s just too damned good not to keep playing.

        Like

      2. ceekyuucee

        Lmao, they were mostly grunts and jackals. I don’t mess with Elites without a checkpoint wall. It feels pretty awesome when you do survive though.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s